Demonstration
Illustrative figures in the IGS clock-comparison domain. Quantitative claims and validation: technical note.
This page uses schematic visuals in the same public IGS long-baseline clock-comparison problem setting described in the technical note. The bars and histogram are illustrative—they are not a publication of raw run artifacts, bin counts, or per-epoch products. Audited numbers, holdout design, and scope are only in the technical note. No parameters, functional form, or implementation details appear here.
Concept: same comparison stream, same residual metric, correction applied—shown as a simple graphic only.
Illustrative reduction shown: ~45% (see technical note for validated ranges and protocol)
- Setting
- Public IGS clock-comparison domain (as in technical note)
- Graphic
- Schematic—not literal binned output from a named run
- Metric
- RMS residual (conceptual)
Distribution of residuals
Schematic distributions for intuition only—not empirical histograms from a disclosed dataset. Does not reveal inputs, state, or processing steps.
Notes
- The correction method is proprietary and patent pending—nothing on this page is sufficient to infer or reproduce it.
- Figures are illustrative; do not treat them as forensic evidence of a specific run.
- For effect size, analysis centers, years, and holdout protocol, use the technical note only.
Pilot evaluations
Qualified laboratories may submit their own datasets for evaluation. Banlys offers a 90-day pilot program in which submitted GNSS timing datasets are processed using the correction method. The algorithm itself is not disclosed; participants receive corrected outputs and statistical comparisons.
Analysis performed by Banlys, LLC · Oakwood, Texas, USA